<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photoshop JPEG quality 51 trick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roytanck.com/2007/07/12/photoshop-jpeg-quality-51-trick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roytanck.com/2007/07/12/photoshop-jpeg-quality-51-trick/</link>
	<description>Basically just a WordPress theme/plugin development playground</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.roytanck.com/2007/07/12/photoshop-jpeg-quality-51-trick/#comment-30103</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roytanck.com/2007/07/12/photoshop-jpeg-quality-51-trick/#comment-30103</guid>
		<description>huh for all my life I used a brainless 80, only on sundays 65. But it seems like I'm now gonna switch to 51. :-) kudos roy!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh for all my life I used a brainless 80, only on sundays 65. But it seems like I&#8217;m now gonna switch to 51. <img src='http://www.roytanck.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> kudos roy!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sint</title>
		<link>http://www.roytanck.com/2007/07/12/photoshop-jpeg-quality-51-trick/#comment-7005</link>
		<dc:creator>Sint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roytanck.com/2007/07/12/photoshop-jpeg-quality-51-trick/#comment-7005</guid>
		<description>Maybe you should study the JPEG compression procedures and report to us what the mathematical reason for this kind of behaviour is...

Lot's of information in this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should study the JPEG compression procedures and report to us what the mathematical reason for this kind of behaviour is&#8230;</p>
<p>Lot&#8217;s of information in this article: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG</a> <img src='http://www.roytanck.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Scholten</title>
		<link>http://www.roytanck.com/2007/07/12/photoshop-jpeg-quality-51-trick/#comment-6909</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Scholten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roytanck.com/2007/07/12/photoshop-jpeg-quality-51-trick/#comment-6909</guid>
		<description>Heeej, still designing for bandwidth? :-)
Wel een goeie vondst; the jpeg quality tipping point…

Hoe'st nou?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heeej, still designing for bandwidth? <img src='http://www.roytanck.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Wel een goeie vondst; the jpeg quality tipping point…</p>
<p>Hoe&#8217;st nou?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
