<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Is anyone still using WordPress 2.3 or earlier?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.roytanck.com/2009/03/10/is-anyone-still-using-wordpress-23-or-earlier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.roytanck.com/2009/03/10/is-anyone-still-using-wordpress-23-or-earlier/</link> <description>Fascinated by new technology</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:04:16 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Patty Francis</title><link>http://www.roytanck.com/2009/03/10/is-anyone-still-using-wordpress-23-or-earlier/comment-page-1/#comment-160899</link> <dc:creator>Patty Francis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 02:36:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roytanck.com/?p=1331#comment-160899</guid> <description>I know that this conversation is a few yours old, and I felt that I had something to say.  Most people keep thier wordpress up to date.  However some plug-ins do not support a newer version of wordpress.  That being said, it&#039;s also possible that if you have done a lot of custom programming to your blog, that it is not a good idea to update, as you could lose all your work.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that this conversation is a few yours old, and I felt that I had something to say.  Most people keep thier wordpress up to date.  However some plug-ins do not support a newer version of wordpress.  That being said, it&#8217;s also possible that if you have done a lot of custom programming to your blog, that it is not a good idea to update, as you could lose all your work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Best Web Hosting Company</title><link>http://www.roytanck.com/2009/03/10/is-anyone-still-using-wordpress-23-or-earlier/comment-page-1/#comment-43859</link> <dc:creator>Best Web Hosting Company</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 02:10:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roytanck.com/?p=1331#comment-43859</guid> <description>I am also using the older version. I&#039;m quite hesitant to upgrade yet cause I might lost my current page rank if I do so.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also using the older version. I&#8217;m quite hesitant to upgrade yet cause I might lost my current page rank if I do so.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roy</title><link>http://www.roytanck.com/2009/03/10/is-anyone-still-using-wordpress-23-or-earlier/comment-page-1/#comment-39745</link> <dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:55:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roytanck.com/?p=1331#comment-39745</guid> <description>@seo: Upgrading WordPress itself shouldn&#039;t be too hard, but there might be incompatibilities with your theme and plugins. Some template tags (which are used in themes) have changed since 2.7 and not every plugin is still &#039;alive&#039;. Disabling all plugins before upgrading is highly recommended, and you could also choose to revert back to the default theme temporarily. Once 2.7.1 is installed you should re-enable things one by one and fix what needs to be fixed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@seo: Upgrading WordPress itself shouldn&#8217;t be too hard, but there might be incompatibilities with your theme and plugins. Some template tags (which are used in themes) have changed since 2.7 and not every plugin is still &#8216;alive&#8217;. Disabling all plugins before upgrading is highly recommended, and you could also choose to revert back to the default theme temporarily. Once 2.7.1 is installed you should re-enable things one by one and fix what needs to be fixed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: seo</title><link>http://www.roytanck.com/2009/03/10/is-anyone-still-using-wordpress-23-or-earlier/comment-page-1/#comment-39738</link> <dc:creator>seo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 05:38:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roytanck.com/?p=1331#comment-39738</guid> <description>We are using the WP 2.3 version but found difficulty in upgrading it to higher version. can any one suggest , how can we do that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are using the WP 2.3 version but found difficulty in upgrading it to higher version. can any one suggest , how can we do that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roy</title><link>http://www.roytanck.com/2009/03/10/is-anyone-still-using-wordpress-23-or-earlier/comment-page-1/#comment-37822</link> <dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:18:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roytanck.com/?p=1331#comment-37822</guid> <description>I actually have a blog running 2.3.3 myself for the same reason. There have been so many little changes to the template tags that I&#039;m not looking forward to bringing it up to speed. Another major reason not to upgrade is that I don&#039;t write that blog myself, but in conjunction with guest authors. Some of whom are still having trouble uploading images etc. I&#039;d have to do a new &#039;manual&#039; too.WP-Cumulus 1.20 is out now, and does still support WordPress 2.3. It lacks shortcode attributes support on 2.3, but it does work.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually have a blog running 2.3.3 myself for the same reason. There have been so many little changes to the template tags that I&#8217;m not looking forward to bringing it up to speed. Another major reason not to upgrade is that I don&#8217;t write that blog myself, but in conjunction with guest authors. Some of whom are still having trouble uploading images etc. I&#8217;d have to do a new &#8216;manual&#8217; too.</p><p>WP-Cumulus 1.20 is out now, and does still support WordPress 2.3. It lacks shortcode attributes support on 2.3, but it does work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zach</title><link>http://www.roytanck.com/2009/03/10/is-anyone-still-using-wordpress-23-or-earlier/comment-page-1/#comment-37789</link> <dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:40:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roytanck.com/?p=1331#comment-37789</guid> <description>Yes. I have a client who uses an older version. He had a design firm create a custom template for him and is concerned that upgrading Word Press might break it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. I have a client who uses an older version. He had a design firm create a custom template for him and is concerned that upgrading Word Press might break it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://www.roytanck.com/2009/03/10/is-anyone-still-using-wordpress-23-or-earlier/comment-page-1/#comment-37683</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:10:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roytanck.com/?p=1331#comment-37683</guid> <description>Not completely related but I recently had to log in to a WP site to leave a comment and I saw the upgrade to 2.7.1 message at the top, gasp!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not completely related but I recently had to log in to a WP site to leave a comment and I saw the upgrade to 2.7.1 message at the top, gasp!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
