<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The (non)sense of using HD video as a benchmark</title> <atom:link href="http://www.roytanck.com/2009/07/01/the-nonsense-of-using-hd-video-as-a-benchmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.roytanck.com/2009/07/01/the-nonsense-of-using-hd-video-as-a-benchmark/</link> <description>Fascinated by new technology</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:04:16 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: gorbe</title><link>http://www.roytanck.com/2009/07/01/the-nonsense-of-using-hd-video-as-a-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-120756</link> <dc:creator>gorbe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:41:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roytanck.com/?p=1976#comment-120756</guid> <description>100% agree, i saw something about HD on 3 inch mobile phone display..what a nonsense. I have 3 monitors (17,19 and 24 inch) and i could not tell the difference on any of them for 720 vs 1080p content..what a fouls trap that 1080p it is if u do not have at least  32 inch display or bigger.
Regards</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% agree, i saw something about HD on 3 inch mobile phone display..what a nonsense. I have 3 monitors (17,19 and 24 inch) and i could not tell the difference on any of them for 720 vs 1080p content..what a fouls trap that 1080p it is if u do not have at least  32 inch display or bigger.<br /> Regards</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pete Needham</title><link>http://www.roytanck.com/2009/07/01/the-nonsense-of-using-hd-video-as-a-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-54316</link> <dc:creator>Pete Needham</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:20:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roytanck.com/?p=1976#comment-54316</guid> <description>I agree in part with what you say, but there is one distinct advantage to all this technology jockeying, and that is that it is unifying the production standards..  Bluray is the same technical spec across the planet, and apart from Zones, unifies a hotch-potch of different frame rates, sizes, colour bandwidths and such, PAL, SECAM, NTSC etc.This ultimately means that its going to be easier to produce content, with unified tool-sets and such, even if the processors needed to render the stuff in real time are not quite here yet!Looking at my home quality AVCDH video of my kids compared to what I have of my past (Cini8 Film, about 4 minutes of it in all!) is a remarkable step up to me, although the 20 hours of hi-def european trip I just took on Memory Sticks are wondering where they are going to be stored down the track!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree in part with what you say, but there is one distinct advantage to all this technology jockeying, and that is that it is unifying the production standards..  Bluray is the same technical spec across the planet, and apart from Zones, unifies a hotch-potch of different frame rates, sizes, colour bandwidths and such, PAL, SECAM, NTSC etc.</p><p>This ultimately means that its going to be easier to produce content, with unified tool-sets and such, even if the processors needed to render the stuff in real time are not quite here yet!</p><p>Looking at my home quality AVCDH video of my kids compared to what I have of my past (Cini8 Film, about 4 minutes of it in all!) is a remarkable step up to me, although the 20 hours of hi-def european trip I just took on Memory Sticks are wondering where they are going to be stored down the track!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AlviHalderman</title><link>http://www.roytanck.com/2009/07/01/the-nonsense-of-using-hd-video-as-a-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-53680</link> <dc:creator>AlviHalderman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:22:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roytanck.com/?p=1976#comment-53680</guid> <description>You are right, i know you have a EEEPC, and i have problems  to watch YouTube in HD with my Acer Aspire One, that&#039;s because this tiny computers just can&#039;t do it :)If this is High definition, i imagine that in 30 years when the resolution will be 16.000 x 9.000 it will be called spatial definition :)) ? HD is great, but not the biggest thing</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, i know you have a EEEPC, and i have problems  to watch YouTube in HD with my Acer Aspire One, that&#8217;s because this tiny computers just can&#8217;t do it <img src='http://www.roytanck.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>If this is High definition, i imagine that in 30 years when the resolution will be 16.000 x 9.000 it will be called spatial definition <img src='http://www.roytanck.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ) ? HD is great, but not the biggest thing</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fine HD &#187; The (non)sense of using HD video as a benchmark &#124; Roy Tanck&#8217;s weblog</title><link>http://www.roytanck.com/2009/07/01/the-nonsense-of-using-hd-video-as-a-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-53241</link> <dc:creator>Fine HD &#187; The (non)sense of using HD video as a benchmark &#124; Roy Tanck&#8217;s weblog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:14:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roytanck.com/?p=1976#comment-53241</guid> <description>[...] More : The (non)sense of using HD video as a benchmark &#124; Roy Tanck&#8217;s weblog VN:F [1.4.4_707]please wait...Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More : The (non)sense of using HD video as a benchmark | Roy Tanck&#8217;s weblog VN:F [1.4.4_707]please wait&#8230;Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
